[Teaching_Composition] NEW MODULE
Hastings, Waller
teaching_composition@mailman.eppg.com
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 14:20:05 -0600
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C643B6.DA66E388
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
While it may, indeed, be an overgeneralization, I think for
most students to write "Christians believe" is in fact a good first step
toward understanding that others may have different values. This
student has at least recognized that the particular statement that
follows this leads into may not be accepted by everyone - only by
"Christians," however that term is understood. Contrast that to the
student I had several years ago (one who had had 12 years of instruction
in religion through her Catholic school) who did not know that
non-Christians (specifically, in this case, Buddhists and Hindus) did
not accept the Bible as holy scripture.
Also, surely, there ARE a few things that could be stated
categorically as part of Christian belief. Surely, the spiritual and
ethical significance of the teachings of Jesus Christ might be given as
something that "Christians believe. . ." since the absence of such a
belief would make the label "Christians" meaningless. However, the
things that all Christians, regardless of denomination, might be
expected to believe are such broad, generalized beliefs that they aren't
likely to be very helpful in pursuing any particular argument.
=20
waller hastings
northern state university
aberdeen, sd 57401
hastingw@northern.edu
=20
"I beseech you in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be
mistaken." - Oliver Cromwell, to his enemies
________________________________
From: teaching_composition-admin@mailman.eppg.com
[mailto:teaching_composition-admin@mailman.eppg.com] On Behalf Of Pat
McQueeney
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:00 PM
To: teaching_composition@mailman.eppg.com;
teaching_composition@mailman.eppg.com
Subject: RE: Re: [Teaching_Composition] NEW MODULE
=20
Maybe someone can help me give credit for this idea (definitely not
original with me), but I have students discuss issues through "lenses":
economic, political, moral, etc. It works beautifully and they
understand the idea of looking through glasses or a camera.=20
Unfortunately, when dealing with morality, students still have a
difficulty dealing with the possibility that their values may not be
universal. Today, for example, I asked a student if her sentence that
began with "Christians believe..." was, in that case, an
over-generalization, because her understanding of Christianity is not
held universally by Christians.
Mary Pat McQueeney
Johnson County Community College English Overland Park, KS
http://staff.jccc.net/pmcqueen
"Good writing is hard work!" ~~Snoopy
=20
=20
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto
("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and
is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or
entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and
state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that
retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please
immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently
delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.=20
=20
=20
-----Original Message-----=20
=20
From: teaching_composition-admin@mailman.eppg.com on behalf of Laura D
Card
Sent: Wed 3/8/2006 10:02 AM
To: teaching_composition@mailman.eppg.com
Subject: Re: Re: [Teaching_Composition] NEW MODULE
First of all, thank you for bringing up this module topic. So far,
you've discussed some of the very ideas I've struggled with and I
appreciate your insights. Right now I teach at a church-owned
university, but I have taught at a state-run university and college
where the division of church and state was a concern. Interestingly, at
both the church-owned and the state-run institutions, I have taught
people of various faiths who brought their beliefs into the papers they
wrote for my classes, so addressing the process of making a logical
argument where moral and faith-based values enter into play hits close
to home and seems to hit close to home for many of you.
At first, when I first started teaching, I was adamant about my students
learning to make good arguments based on the sound logic valued by
secular scholars. However, lately I've been re-thinking my stance as
being narrow-minded and short-sighted. So, here's a question: Have any
of you talked about audience, purpose, and context in relation to the
arguments being made? It seems to me that at times using scripture or
ecclesiastical quotes might be absolutely in order if the purpose is to
write a theological text or if the audience would also accept the
authority of such texts. In fact, students with strong beliefs need to
know how to write arguments within their belief structure. Then at other
times it would be useful to know how to construct an argument supporting
the same ideals or discussing the same topic, but using secular texts
and examples as evidence. I haven't tried it (has anyone?), but it seems
like it would be an interesting and useful exercise to write about the
same value-based topic from a religious standpoint, or environmental or
whatever, and then write about it from a "non-believer" standpoint. Not
everyone will be persuaded by the same type of evidence or argument, but
there is a crying need to be able to see various viewpoints and be
somewhat logical about them so we can communicate about common problems
and understand where people with different perspectives are coming from
and maybe come to some kind of productive consensus. Anyone had any
success doing anything like writing from two different stances?
Laura Card
English Department
Brigham Young University
-----Original Message-----
From: Connie Schomburg <schomburgc@yahoo.com>
To: teaching_composition@mailman.eppg.com
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 06:39:47 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [Teaching_Composition] NEW MODULE
Hi Everyone,
I can't imagine "banning" discussions of personal
issues like faith or politics; the best/most
interesting class discussions I've ever tried to
moderate revolved around those very issues. And yes,
I know that some students are inclined to cite
religious texts as support for their arguments even
though that support is based on emotion, not fact...
but I think my job as their instructor is to try to
convince them that there may be and probably are other
ways of viewing the topic under discussion. I believe
my job is to welcome (and challenge, if need be) ALL
of their viewpoints, whether I personally agree with
them or not. As one who holds deeply-felt beliefs
about a number of topics, why would I want my students
to cringe from doing so? I'm awfully glad we've been
invited to share our opinions in this module!
Dr. Connie Schomburg
Creighton University
--- Emmanuel Sigauke <esigauke@ccsf.edu> wrote:
> Let me be the first to respond. When I teach
> research and the use of evidence, I often remind the
> students to be fair in the presentation of grounds
> and warrants for their claims. By fairness I mean
> they should provide evidence that leaves room
> objections. As a teacher I do not want to seem to be
> telling a student that his or her religious support
> for a claim is fallacious. While I may, I realize
> that this may have a strong effect on the way the
> student write after the feedback. While there is
> nothing wrong in inviting the authority of a
> religious document in presenting and supporting a
> claim, the invocation should be done is a way that
> weakens the writer's argument. I have often noticed
> that where religious grounds are used there is
> usually argument. Debates on issues like gay
> marriage, capital punishment are cases in point.
> Supporting a point of view on these issues soley on
> religious grounds may limit the student options, and
> worse, the reader's response. For instance, if!
> a student were to use a Bible verse to support a
> claim, there is the possibility that objections may
> center on the verse, and not the argument; yet,
> respecting the authority of the Bible, some students
> may not be willing to argue against the stated
> message.
> Additionally, given that some readers may be
> concerned with showing their sensitivity to the
> reader's religious faith, they may not be willing to
> seem to oppose what at the moment may seem
> "politically correct".
> Some kinds of evidence, for instance what
> Shakespeare said, or the Oxford Advanced Dictionary,
> or the Webster's may have the same effect that use
> of faith may have in arguments. Their supposed
> authority may be used to "shut" readers up, hence
> contributing to the ever expanding field of
> fallacies.
>
>
> Emmanuel Sigauke
> English Department
> City College of San Francisco
> 50 Phelan Avenue
> San Francisco, CA 94112
> Phone:(415) 452-7059
> >>> chris_anson@ncsu.edu 03/03/06 7:38 PM >>>
> TeachingComp Listers:
>
>
> Perhaps you've heard or experienced the following in
> your work as a=20
> writing teacher or WPA:
>
> "I disallow the use of religious texts as
> appropriate evidence for=20
> argumentative writing."
>
> "Expressions of faith are OK in my class as long as
> they're in mostly=20
> expressive writing such as journals, freewrites, and
> the like."
>
> "In class discussions, I shy away from highly
> personal accounts=20
> because they are too emotionally charged, and these
> include matters=20
> of political ideology and religion."
>
> "I was appalled to learn that my colleague tolerates
> the inclusion of=20
> references to certain faith traditions in some
> students' writing=20
> (mostly among international students who are not
> Christians) but not=20
> from others (mostly American Christians)."
>
> "I welcome everything and anything in my course as
> long as it is not=20
> discriminatory or hateful. Right, left, Christian,
> Muslim, agnostic,=20
> Wikka, anti- and pro-abortion rights, tree-hugging
> and deer-
> shooting . . . . anything."
>
> "I can't stand it when I hear that a composition
> teacher 'bans'=20
> Topics X, Y, and Z from the spectrum of research
> topics*gun control,=20
> abortion, the death penalty . . . we ought to be
> celebrating when=20
> students tackle the most divisive, sensitive, and
> complex areas of=20
> contemporary debate."
>
> "Academic writing is not about the private and the
> personal."
>
> This month's module, led by Elizabeth Vander Lei,
> takes us deep into=20
> some of the most interesting and complicated
> landscape of=20
> contemporary pedagogy, where secular academic goals
> meet with the=20
> wide range of students' systems of faith and
> religious conviction,=20
> from the most passionate devotees to the most
> adamant separators of=20
> church and state to those who don't want to profess
> anything but are=20
> excited nonetheless to bring it all on. Elizabeth's
> focus this month,=20
> on religious faith in composition courses, comes at
> a time when=20
> social forces are colliding in politics and public
> life and making=20
> their way into debates about education, especially
> what should and=20
> shouldn't be taught, allowed, given voice, or
> protected*on behalf of=20
> both teachers and students*in those tangled,
> unpredictable, and=20
> fascinating contact zones of our classrooms.
>
> What do you think is the appropriate place of
> religious faith in the=20
> teaching of writing? What have you told your
> students about religion=20
> and its place in their writing? How have you
> responded to students=20
> who bring religion into their papers in a personal
> way, or use their=20
> own faith traditions to support points they are
> making in their=20
> arguments?
>
> Elizabeth Vander Lei is Associate Professor of
> English at Calvin=20
> College in Grand Rapids, Michigan. She teaches first
> year composition=20
> and advanced courses in writing and the teaching of
> writing. Co-
> editor of Negotiating Religious Faith in the
> Composition Classroom,=20
> Elizabeth was first drawn to this topic by her
> research into the=20
> effects of religious faith on African American
> rhetoric, particularly=20
> that of the modern civil rights movement. She's also
> one of the=20
> nicest, smartest, and hardest working people you
> could hope to meet. =20
> I know: she served admirably on the Executive Board
> of the Council of=20
> Writing Program Administrators, and when her term
> was finally up,=20
> there wasn't a person on the Board who didn't want
> either to sign her=20
> up for life or clone her so she could stay around.
>
> (Now, as to the ethical dimensions of cloning,
> different religions=20
> approach this problem from several perspectives.
> First . . . .)
>
> Check out Elizabeth's module and resources at the
> TeachingComp Web=20
> site, then come back to the list to start talking:
> http://
> www.mhhe.com/socscience/english/tc/
>
> And it's OK*sex, religion, and politics are all
> welcome here at=20
> TeachingComp.
>
> Oh, and before we launch into our discussion, many
> thanks to Suzanne=20
> Blum Malley and Amy Hawkins for leading us last
> month in our=20
> exploration of ethnographic writing, which, although
> it has played an=20
> important role in research in the field and beyond,
> has been somewhat=20
> underrepresented in treatments of pedagogy in spite
> of a strong=20
> interest in its potential. We're all the better
> informed as a result=20
> of their knowledge, experience, and counsel.
>
> Chris Anson
> Moderator
>
>
>
>
> --
> Chris M. Anson
> Professor of English
> Director, Campus Writing and Speaking Program
> Interim Director, Ph.D. in Communication, Rhetoric,
> and Digital Media
>
=3D=3D=3D message truncated =3D=3D=3D
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Teaching_Composition maillist - Teaching_Composition@mailman.eppg.com
http://mailman.eppg.com/mailman/listinfo/teaching_composition
To unsubscribe, please visit
http://mailman.eppg.com/mailman/listinfo/teaching_composition and update
your information.
_______________________________________________
Teaching_Composition maillist - Teaching_Composition@mailman.eppg.com
http://mailman.eppg.com/mailman/listinfo/teaching_composition
To unsubscribe, please visit
http://mailman.eppg.com/mailman/listinfo/teaching_composition and update
your information.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C643B6.DA66E388
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" =
xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:st1=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"
xmlns:ns0=3D"http://www.exclaimer.co.uk" =
xmlns:ns1=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xslt"
xmlns:ns2=3D"http://www.exclaimer.co.uk/rtf">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<title>RE: Re: [Teaching_Composition] NEW MODULE</title>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name=3D"PostalCode"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name=3D"State" =
downloadurl=3D"http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name=3D"PlaceName" downloadurl=3D"http://www.5iantlavalamp.com/"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name=3D"PlaceType" downloadurl=3D"http://www.5iantlavalamp.com/"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name=3D"Street"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name=3D"address"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name=3D"City" =
downloadurl=3D"http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name=3D"place" downloadurl=3D"http://www.5iantlavalamp.com/"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name=3D"PersonName"/>
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Arial;
color:navy;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dblue>
<div class=3DSection1>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'> =
While it may, indeed, be an
overgeneralization, I think for most students to write “Christians
believe” is in fact a good first step toward understanding that =
others
may have different values. This student has at least recognized =
that the
particular statement that follows this leads into may not be accepted by
everyone – only by “Christians,” however that term is
understood. Contrast that to the student I had several years ago =
(one who had
had 12 years of instruction in religion through her Catholic school) who =
did
not know that non-Christians (specifically, in this case, Buddhists and =
Hindus)
did not accept the Bible as holy scripture.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'> =
Also, surely, there ARE a few
things that could be stated categorically as part of Christian =
belief. Surely,
the spiritual and ethical significance of the teachings of Jesus Christ =
might
be given as something that “Christians believe. . .” since =
the
absence of such a belief would make the label “Christians”
meaningless. However, the things that all Christians, regardless =
of
denomination, might be expected to believe are such broad, generalized =
beliefs
that they aren’t likely to be very helpful in pursuing any =
particular
argument.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>waller <st1:City =
w:st=3D"on"><st1:place
w:st=3D"on">hastings</st1:place></st1:City></span></font><font =
color=3Dnavy><span
style=3D'color:navy'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>northern state =
university</span></font><font
color=3Dnavy><span style=3D'color:navy'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><st1:City w:st=3D"on"><st1:place w:st=3D"on"><font =
size=3D2
color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;
color:navy'>aberdeen</span></font></st1:place></st1:City><font =
size=3D2
color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;
color:navy'>, sd 57401</span></font><font color=3Dnavy><span =
style=3D'color:navy'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><strong><b><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy =
face=3DArial><span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><a
href=3D"mailto:hastingw@northern.edu">hastingw@northern.edu</a></span></f=
ont></b></strong><font
color=3Dnavy><span style=3D'color:navy'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New =
Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy'> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>=
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>"I beseech you in the bowels =
of
Christ, think it possible you may be mistaken." - Oliver Cromwell, =
to his
enemies</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div class=3DMsoNormal align=3Dcenter style=3D'text-align:center'><font =
size=3D3
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=3D3 width=3D"100%" align=3Dcenter tabindex=3D-1>
</span></font></div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><b><font size=3D2 face=3DTahoma><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font =
size=3D2
face=3DTahoma><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>
teaching_composition-admin@mailman.eppg.com
[mailto:teaching_composition-admin@mailman.eppg.com] <b><span =
style=3D'font-weight:
bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b>Pat McQueeney<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Wednesday, March =
08, 2006
11:00 PM<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> <st1:PersonName =
w:st=3D"on">teaching_composition@mailman.eppg.com</st1:PersonName>;
<st1:PersonName =
w:st=3D"on">teaching_composition@mailman.eppg.com</st1:PersonName><br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> RE: Re:
[Teaching_Composition] NEW MODULE</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<p style=3D'margin-bottom:12.0pt'><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Maybe someone can help me give credit for this =
idea
(definitely not original with me), but I have students discuss issues =
through
"lenses": economic, political, moral, etc. It =
works
beautifully and they understand the idea of looking through glasses or a =
camera. <br>
<br>
Unfortunately, when dealing with morality, students still have a
difficulty dealing with the possibility that their values may not be
universal. Today, for example, I asked a student if her sentence =
that
began with "Christians believe..." was, in that case, an =
over-generalization,
because her understanding of Christianity is not held universally by
Christians.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Mary Pat McQueeney<br>
<st1:PlaceName w:st=3D"on">Johnson</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceType =
w:st=3D"on">County</st1:PlaceType>
<st1:PlaceType w:st=3D"on">Community College</st1:PlaceType> English =
<st1:place
w:st=3D"on"><st1:City w:st=3D"on">Overland Park</st1:City>, <st1:State =
w:st=3D"on">KS</st1:State></st1:place><br>
<a =
href=3D"http://staff.jccc.net/pmcqueen">http://staff.jccc.net/pmcqueen</a=
><br>
<br>
"Good writing is hard work!" ~~Snoopy<br>
<br>
<br>
</span></font><font face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-family:Arial'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:Arial'> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:Arial'> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D1 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:7.5pt;
font-family:Arial'>The information contained in this e-mail and any =
attachments
thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community =
College
("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of =
only
the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected =
by
federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If =
the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified =
that
retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is =
strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately =
notify
JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail =
message
and any attachments thereto. Thank you.</span></font><font size=3D1
face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Courier =
New"'> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D1 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New"'> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D1 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New"'> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>-----Original Message-----</span></font><font =
size=3D1
face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Courier =
New"'> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D1 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New"'> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-bottom:12.0pt'><font size=3D3 =
face=3DArial><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial'><br>
From: teaching_composition-admin@mailman.eppg.com on behalf of Laura D =
Card<br>
Sent: Wed 3/8/2006 10:02 AM<br>
To: <st1:PersonName =
w:st=3D"on">teaching_composition@mailman.eppg.com</st1:PersonName><br>
Subject: Re: Re: [Teaching_Composition] NEW MODULE<br>
<br>
First of all, thank you for bringing up this module topic. So far, =
you've
discussed some of the very ideas I've struggled with and I appreciate =
your
insights. Right now I teach at a church-owned university, but I have =
taught at
a state-run university and college where the division of church and =
state was a
concern. Interestingly, at both the church-owned and the state-run
institutions, I have taught people of various faiths who brought their =
beliefs
into the papers they wrote for my classes, so addressing the process of =
making
a logical argument where moral and faith-based values enter into play =
hits
close to home and seems to hit close to home for many of you.<br>
At first, when I first started teaching, I was adamant about my students
learning to make good arguments based on the sound logic valued by =
secular
scholars. However, lately I've been re-thinking my stance as being
narrow-minded and short-sighted. So, here's a question: Have any of you =
talked
about audience, purpose, and context in relation to the arguments being =
made?
It seems to me that at times using scripture or ecclesiastical quotes =
might be
absolutely in order if the purpose is to write a theological text or if =
the
audience would also accept the authority of such texts. In fact, =
students with
strong beliefs need to know how to write arguments within their belief
structure. Then at other times it would be useful to know how to =
construct an
argument supporting the same ideals or discussing the same topic, but =
using
secular texts and examples as evidence. I haven't tried it (has =
anyone?), but
it seems like it would be an interesting and useful exercise to write =
about the
same value-based topic from a religious standpoint, or environmental or
whatever, and then write about it from a "non-believer" =
standpoint.
Not everyone will be persuaded by the same type of evidence or argument, =
but
there is a crying need to be able to see various viewpoints and be =
somewhat
logical about them so we can communicate about common problems and =
understand
where people with different perspectives are coming from and maybe come =
to some
kind of productive consensus. Anyone had any success doing anything like
writing from two different stances?<br>
<br>
Laura Card<br>
English Department<br>
<st1:place w:st=3D"on"><st1:PlaceName =
w:st=3D"on">Brigham</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceName
w:st=3D"on">Young</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceType =
w:st=3D"on">University</st1:PlaceType></st1:place><br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Connie Schomburg <schomburgc@yahoo.com><br>
To: <st1:PersonName =
w:st=3D"on">teaching_composition@mailman.eppg.com</st1:PersonName><br>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 06:39:47 -0800 (PST)<br>
Subject: Re: [Teaching_Composition] NEW MODULE<br>
<br>
Hi Everyone,<br>
I can't imagine "banning" discussions of personal<br>
issues like faith or politics; the best/most<br>
interesting class discussions I've ever tried to<br>
moderate revolved around those very issues. And yes,<br>
I know that some students are inclined to cite<br>
religious texts as support for their arguments even<br>
though that support is based on emotion, not fact...<br>
but I think my job as their instructor is to try to<br>
convince them that there may be and probably are other<br>
ways of viewing the topic under discussion. I believe<br>
my job is to welcome (and challenge, if need be) ALL<br>
of their viewpoints, whether I personally agree with<br>
them or not. As one who holds deeply-felt beliefs<br>
about a number of topics, why would I want my students<br>
to cringe from doing so? I'm awfully glad we've been<br>
invited to share our opinions in this module!<br>
Dr. Connie Schomburg<br>
<st1:place w:st=3D"on"><st1:PlaceName =
w:st=3D"on">Creighton</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceType
w:st=3D"on">University</st1:PlaceType></st1:place><br>
<br>
--- Emmanuel Sigauke <esigauke@ccsf.edu> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Let me be the first to respond. When I teach<br>
> research and the use of evidence, I often remind the<br>
> students to be fair in the presentation of grounds<br>
> and warrants for their claims. By fairness I mean<br>
> they should provide evidence that leaves room<br>
> objections. As a teacher I do not want to seem to be<br>
> telling a student that his or her religious support<br>
> for a claim is fallacious. While I may, I realize<br>
> that this may have a strong effect on the way the<br>
> student write after the feedback. While there is<br>
> nothing wrong in inviting the authority of a<br>
> religious document in presenting and supporting a<br>
> claim, the invocation should be done is a way that<br>
> weakens the writer's argument. I have often noticed<br>
> that where religious grounds are used there is<br>
> usually argument. Debates on issues like gay<br>
> marriage, capital punishment are cases in point.<br>
> Supporting a point of view on these issues soley on<br>
> religious grounds may limit the student options, and<br>
> worse, the reader's response. For instance, if!<br>
> a student were to use a Bible verse to support a<br>
> claim, there is the possibility that objections may<br>
> center on the verse, and not the argument; yet,<br>
> respecting the authority of the Bible, some students<br>
> may not be willing to argue against the stated<br>
> message.<br>
> Additionally, given that some readers may be<br>
> concerned with showing their sensitivity to the<br>
> reader's religious faith, they may not be willing to<br>
> seem to oppose what at the moment may seem<br>
> "politically correct".<br>
> Some kinds of evidence, for instance what<br>
> Shakespeare said, or the Oxford Advanced Dictionary,<br>
> or the Webster's may have the same effect that use<br>
> of faith may have in arguments. Their supposed<br>
> authority may be used to "shut" readers up, hence<br>
> contributing to the ever expanding field of<br>
> fallacies.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Emmanuel Sigauke<br>
> English Department<br>
> <st1:PlaceType w:st=3D"on">City</st1:PlaceType> <st1:PlaceType =
w:st=3D"on">College</st1:PlaceType>
of <st1:City w:st=3D"on"><st1:place w:st=3D"on">San =
Francisco</st1:place></st1:City><br>
> <st1:Street w:st=3D"on"><st1:address w:st=3D"on">50 Phelan =
Avenue</st1:address></st1:Street><br>
> <st1:place w:st=3D"on"><st1:City w:st=3D"on">San =
Francisco</st1:City>, <st1:State
w:st=3D"on">CA</st1:State> <st1:PostalCode =
w:st=3D"on">94112</st1:PostalCode></st1:place><br>
> Phone:(415) 452-7059<br>
> >>> chris_anson@ncsu.edu 03/03/06 7:38 PM >>><br>
> TeachingComp Listers:<br>
><br>
><br>
> Perhaps you’ve heard or experienced the following in<br>
> your work as a <br>
> writing teacher or WPA:<br>
><br>
> “I disallow the use of religious texts as<br>
> appropriate evidence for <br>
> argumentative writing.”<br>
><br>
> “Expressions of faith are OK in my class as long as<br>
> they’re in mostly <br>
> expressive writing such as journals, freewrites, and<br>
> the like.”<br>
><br>
> “In class discussions, I shy away from highly<br>
> personal accounts <br>
> because they are too emotionally charged, and these<br>
> include matters <br>
> of political ideology and religion.”<br>
><br>
> “I was appalled to learn that my colleague tolerates<br>
> the inclusion of <br>
> references to certain faith traditions in some<br>
> students’ writing <br>
> (mostly among international students who are not<br>
> Christians) but not <br>
> from others (mostly American Christians).”<br>
><br>
> “I welcome everything and anything in my course as<br>
> long as it is not <br>
> discriminatory or hateful. Right, left, Christian,<br>
> Muslim, agnostic, <br>
> Wikka, anti- and pro-abortion rights, tree-hugging<br>
> and deer-<br>
> shooting . . . . anything.”<br>
><br>
> “I can’t stand it when I hear that a composition<br>
> teacher ‘bans’ <br>
> Topics X, Y, and Z from the spectrum of research<br>
> topics*gun control, <br>
> abortion, the death penalty . . . we ought to be<br>
> celebrating when <br>
> students tackle the most divisive, sensitive, and<br>
> complex areas of <br>
> contemporary debate.”<br>
><br>
> “Academic writing is not about the private and the<br>
> personal.”<br>
><br>
> This month’s module, led by Elizabeth Vander Lei,<br>
> takes us deep into <br>
> some of the most interesting and complicated<br>
> landscape of <br>
> contemporary pedagogy, where secular academic goals<br>
> meet with the <br>
> wide range of students’ systems of faith and<br>
> religious conviction, <br>
> from the most passionate devotees to the most<br>
> adamant separators of <br>
> church and state to those who don’t want to profess<br>
> anything but are <br>
> excited nonetheless to bring it all on. <st1:City =
w:st=3D"on"><st1:place
w:st=3D"on">Elizabeth</st1:place></st1:City>’s<br>
> focus this month, <br>
> on religious faith in composition courses, comes at<br>
> a time when <br>
> social forces are colliding in politics and public<br>
> life and making <br>
> their way into debates about education, especially<br>
> what should and <br>
> shouldn’t be taught, allowed, given voice, or<br>
> protected*on behalf of <br>
> both teachers and students*in those tangled,<br>
> unpredictable, and <br>
> fascinating contact zones of our classrooms.<br>
><br>
> What do you think is the appropriate place of<br>
> religious faith in the <br>
> teaching of writing? What have you told your<br>
> students about religion <br>
> and its place in their writing? How have you<br>
> responded to students <br>
> who bring religion into their papers in a personal<br>
> way, or use their <br>
> own faith traditions to support points they are<br>
> making in their <br>
> arguments?<br>
><br>
> Elizabeth Vander Lei is Associate Professor of<br>
> English at Calvin <br>
> College in <st1:place w:st=3D"on"><st1:City w:st=3D"on">Grand =
Rapids</st1:City>,
<st1:State w:st=3D"on">Michigan</st1:State></st1:place>. She teaches =
first<br>
> year composition <br>
> and advanced courses in writing and the teaching of<br>
> writing. Co-<br>
> editor of Negotiating Religious Faith in the<br>
> Composition Classroom, <br>
> <st1:City w:st=3D"on"><st1:place =
w:st=3D"on">Elizabeth</st1:place></st1:City>
was first drawn to this topic by her<br>
> research into the <br>
> effects of religious faith on African American<br>
> rhetoric, particularly <br>
> that of the modern civil rights movement. She’s also<br>
> one of the <br>
> nicest, smartest, and hardest working people you<br>
> could hope to meet. <br>
> I know: she served admirably on the Executive Board<br>
> of the Council of <br>
> Writing Program Administrators, and when her term<br>
> was finally up, <br>
> there wasn’t a person on the Board who didn’t want<br>
> either to sign her <br>
> up for life or clone her so she could stay around.<br>
><br>
> (Now, as to the ethical dimensions of cloning,<br>
> different religions <br>
> approach this problem from several perspectives.<br>
> First . . . .)<br>
><br>
> Check out <st1:City w:st=3D"on"><st1:place =
w:st=3D"on">Elizabeth</st1:place></st1:City>’s
module and resources at the<br>
> TeachingComp Web <br>
> site, then come back to the list to start talking:<br>
> <a href=3D"http://">http://</a><br>
> www.mhhe.com/socscience/english/tc/<br>
><br>
> And it’s OK*sex, religion, and politics are all<br>
> welcome here at <br>
> TeachingComp.<br>
><br>
> Oh, and before we launch into our discussion, many<br>
> thanks to Suzanne <br>
> Blum Malley and Amy Hawkins for leading us last<br>
> month in our <br>
> exploration of ethnographic writing, which, although<br>
> it has played an <br>
> important role in research in the field and beyond,<br>
> has been somewhat <br>
> underrepresented in treatments of pedagogy in spite<br>
> of a strong <br>
> interest in its potential. We’re all the better<br>
> informed as a result <br>
> of their knowledge, experience, and counsel.<br>
><br>
> Chris Anson<br>
> Moderator<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Chris M. Anson<br>
> Professor of English<br>
> Director, Campus Writing and Speaking Program<br>
> Interim Director, Ph.D. in Communication, Rhetoric,<br>
> and Digital Media<br>
><br>
=3D=3D=3D message truncated =3D=3D=3D<br>
<br>
<br>
__________________________________________________<br>
Do You Yahoo!?<br>
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around<br>
<a href=3D"http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Teaching_Composition maillist -
Teaching_Composition@mailman.eppg.com<br>
<a =
href=3D"http://mailman.eppg.com/mailman/listinfo/teaching_composition">ht=
tp://mailman.eppg.com/mailman/listinfo/teaching_composition</a><br>
<br>
To unsubscribe, please visit <a
href=3D"http://mailman.eppg.com/mailman/listinfo/teaching_composition">ht=
tp://mailman.eppg.com/mailman/listinfo/teaching_composition</a>
and update your information.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Teaching_Composition maillist -
Teaching_Composition@mailman.eppg.com<br>
<a =
href=3D"http://mailman.eppg.com/mailman/listinfo/teaching_composition">ht=
tp://mailman.eppg.com/mailman/listinfo/teaching_composition</a><br>
<br>
To unsubscribe, please visit <a
href=3D"http://mailman.eppg.com/mailman/listinfo/teaching_composition">ht=
tp://mailman.eppg.com/mailman/listinfo/teaching_composition</a>
and update your information.</span></font><font size=3D1 face=3D"Courier =
New"><span
style=3D'font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Courier =
New"'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C643B6.DA66E388--